Skip to content
Back to blog
10 April 2026·Domato Team

Best Mortgage Broker Software in Australia (2026): A Practical Comparison

guidebrokeriqmortgage-brokingcomparison

If you're a mortgage broker in Australia looking for software, you've probably noticed that the market is confusing. Some tools call themselves CRMs. Others call themselves broker platforms. Some are aggregator-provided. Others are independent. And they all claim to be "all-in-one."

The truth is, no single tool does everything perfectly. But some combinations work much better than others — and the right choice depends on how you actually work, not on feature checklists.

Here's an honest comparison of what's available in 2026, what each tool actually does well, and where the gaps are.

The landscape: what types of software exist

Before comparing specific tools, it helps to understand the categories:

1. Aggregator platforms

These come bundled with your aggregator membership. They handle compliance, lodgement, and commission tracking — because that's what the aggregator needs.

Examples: Connective Mercury, AFG FLEX, Loan Market Platform, PLAN/Choice/FAST broker portal

What they do well: Compliance documentation, lodgement to lender panels, commission tracking, accreditation management.

What they don't do well: Scenario modelling, client communication, lead management, and day-to-day workflow. They're built for the aggregator's needs, not the broker's daily workflow.

2. CRMs (Customer Relationship Management)

General-purpose or broker-specific CRMs focus on managing client relationships, tracking pipelines, and automating follow-ups.

Examples: Salestrekker, BrokerEngine, MyCRM (by Connective), HubSpot/Salesforce (generic)

What they do well: Pipeline management, client communication tracking, task management, reporting on deal flow.

What they don't do well: Actual broking work — servicing calculations, lender product comparison, scenario modelling. A CRM tells you where a deal is in your pipeline; it doesn't help you structure the deal.

3. Calculators and rate comparison tools

Standalone tools for running specific calculations or comparing rates.

Examples: InfoChoice, RateCity, HashChing, various broker calculator apps

What they do well: Quick rate comparisons, basic borrowing capacity estimates, stamp duty calculations.

What they don't do well: Full scenario modelling, lender-specific servicing calculations, integration with your workflow. They're reference tools, not workflow tools.

4. Purpose-built broker workspaces

A newer category that combines scenario modelling, lender matching, client intake, and lodgement into a single workspace designed for how brokers actually work.

Examples: BrokerIQ, NextGen (emerging)

What they do well: End-to-end deal workflow — from scenario building through lender matching to lodgement. They're designed for the work between "client enquiry" and "deal submitted."

What they don't do well: They typically don't replace your aggregator platform for compliance, and may not have the pipeline reporting depth of a dedicated CRM.

Comparing the key tools

Aggregator platforms

Connective Mercury

Mercury is Connective's broker platform and one of the most widely used in Australia.

Strengths:

  • Deep integration with Connective's lender panel
  • Compliance workflow built in (responsible lending, privacy, credit guide)
  • Commission tracking and split management
  • Lodgement directly to lenders via ApplyOnline
  • Client portal for document collection

Weaknesses:

  • The interface feels dated compared to modern tools
  • Scenario modelling is basic — you can't easily compare multiple structures
  • No real-time lender product matching against CDR data
  • Limited AI or automation capabilities
  • Reporting is compliance-focused, not insight-focused

Cost: Included with Connective membership

Best for: Connective brokers who need a compliance-first platform and are comfortable supplementing with other tools for scenario work.

AFG FLEX

AFG's broker platform, redesigned in recent years.

Strengths:

  • Clean, modern interface
  • Good mobile experience
  • Integration with AFG's lender panel
  • Digital fact-find and client portal
  • Built-in video meeting capability

Weaknesses:

  • Locked to AFG's ecosystem
  • Scenario comparison is limited
  • No CDR-based lender matching
  • Limited AI features

Cost: Included with AFG membership

Best for: AFG brokers who want a modern interface without adding third-party tools.

CRMs

Salestrekker

A broker-specific CRM that's popular among larger brokerages.

Strengths:

  • Purpose-built for mortgage brokers (not a generic CRM adapted)
  • Strong pipeline management with visual deal tracking
  • Automated workflows and task management
  • Integration with major aggregator platforms
  • Reporting and analytics on team performance

Weaknesses:

  • Expensive for solo brokers
  • No scenario modelling or lender matching
  • Doesn't handle the actual broking work — it manages the process around it
  • Learning curve for configuration

Cost: From $99/user/month

Best for: Brokerage teams of 5+ who need pipeline visibility and process management.

BrokerEngine

A workflow automation tool specifically for mortgage brokers.

Strengths:

  • Automates client communication workflows (emails, SMS, tasks)
  • Template library for common broker communications
  • Integration with aggregator platforms
  • Good for systematising a brokerage's processes

Weaknesses:

  • More of a workflow tool than a CRM
  • No scenario modelling or lender comparison
  • Can be complex to set up
  • Doesn't replace your aggregator platform

Cost: From $195/month for a solo broker

Best for: Established brokers who want to systematise and automate their client communication.

Purpose-built workspaces

BrokerIQ

A workspace built specifically for the scenario-to-lodgement workflow.

Strengths:

  • Full scenario builder with income, liabilities, properties, HECS, expenses, and funds position
  • CDR lender matching — runs scenarios against real bank products and returns actual max borrowing capacity per lender
  • Risk scan engine that flags approval issues before lodgement
  • AI structuring assistant with what-if simulations
  • AI copilot for in-context questions within scenarios
  • Client intake forms that feed directly into scenarios
  • Document collection via secure upload links
  • Export to LIXI XML (ApplyOnline), Mercury Nexus, Excel, CSV
  • Gmail and Outlook integration
  • Team collaboration with role-based access
  • Lead capture calculator for broker websites

Weaknesses:

  • Newer to market than established platforms
  • Doesn't handle compliance documentation (that stays with your aggregator)
  • Commission tracking not included (aggregator handles this)

Cost: $128/month after 60-day free trial

Best for: Brokers who want to spend less time on scenario modelling and lender research, and more time serving clients. Particularly strong for brokers who deal with complex scenarios where lender selection significantly impacts borrowing capacity.

What most brokers actually need

After talking to hundreds of brokers, the common pain points are remarkably consistent:

1. "I waste too much time on lender research"

Manually checking which lender offers the best capacity for a specific scenario is the single biggest time sink. Brokers default to the 3-4 lenders they know best, potentially missing better options from the other 30+ on their panel.

What solves this: CDR-based lender matching that runs your scenario against every product automatically. This is the single most impactful technology available to brokers right now.

2. "I can't easily compare scenarios"

Clients often want to see "what if we put 20% deposit vs 10%?" or "what if we pay off the car loan first?" Running these comparisons manually means rebuilding calculations from scratch.

What solves this: Scenario modelling with what-if simulation capability.

3. "Client intake is a mess"

Chasing clients for financial details through email, text, and phone is slow and error-prone. Information gets lost, fields get missed, and the broker ends up re-entering data manually.

What solves this: Structured intake forms with secure links, autosave, and direct data flow into scenarios.

4. "I need to know if a deal will get approved before I lodge"

Nothing wastes more time than a declined application. Experienced brokers catch most issues, but everyone misses things occasionally — especially with unfamiliar lenders.

What solves this: Automated risk scanning against known lender policies, with specific actionable flags.

5. "My tools don't talk to each other"

Using a CRM, a spreadsheet, a calculator app, email, and an aggregator portal means constant context-switching and manual data transfer.

What solves this: A workspace that handles the core workflow end-to-end, with export to your aggregator's lodgement platform.

How to choose

If you're a solo broker or small team (1-3 people): Start with your aggregator platform for compliance and lodgement, plus a purpose-built workspace like BrokerIQ for scenario work and client intake. You probably don't need a full CRM yet.

If you're a medium brokerage (4-10 people): You need pipeline visibility, so a CRM like Salestrekker makes sense. Combine it with a scenario workspace for the actual broking work, and your aggregator platform for compliance.

If you're a large brokerage (10+ people): You likely need all three layers — CRM for pipeline and team management, workspace for deal structuring, and aggregator platform for compliance and lodgement. The key is integration between them.

Regardless of size: The highest-impact investment is in lender matching technology. If you're currently using spreadsheets or memory to select lenders, switching to CDR-based matching will save you hours per deal and likely improve client outcomes.

The bottom line

There's no single tool that does everything a mortgage broker needs. The best approach is choosing the right combination for your workflow:

  1. Aggregator platform — for compliance, lodgement, and commissions (you already have this)
  2. Scenario workspace — for the actual broking work (scenario building, lender matching, risk analysis, client intake)
  3. CRM — for pipeline management and client relationships (when your volume justifies it)

The biggest opportunity for most brokers isn't better pipeline management — it's faster, more accurate deal structuring. That's where the time savings and better client outcomes come from.

Try BrokerIQ free for 60 days → — CDR lender matching, risk scanning, AI structuring, and client intake in one workspace.